Okay, I give up. Does anyone have a link to... ( cut for Avengers spoilers )
Question for the thoughtful
Jan. 25th, 2012 09:42 pmI've been pondering this for a day or so. Postulated: a person obsessed with another, for years on end, to the exclusion of all other romantic attachments. But without interfering, at all, in the object's life. Is the obsessed person a stalker?
For the purposes of this scenario, there is no Internet, and--because it's fiction--the obsessed person's pattern will not change to contact at a future point. The object has no idea that the attachment is anything beyond, say, casual friendship, if that.
Any opinions?
For the purposes of this scenario, there is no Internet, and--because it's fiction--the obsessed person's pattern will not change to contact at a future point. The object has no idea that the attachment is anything beyond, say, casual friendship, if that.
Any opinions?
I am way, way out of date. Is there any other Trek book besides John M. Ford's How Much for Just the Planet? that uses the word "dagnabbit"?
I am way, way out of date. Is there any other Trek book besides John M. Ford's How Much for Just the Planet? that uses the word "dagnabbit"?